With laws like "driving to endanger' or "reckless driving", Why do we need hands free and texting laws?
Thanks to the reasonable аnѕwеrѕ.
Lіkе Canada, It would only take a few wins in court to get the message out that is won’t be tolerated.
-
Recent Post
Archives
Translator
Tags
accident and Blackberry Bluetooth car Cars Cell cell phone cell use while driving cell while driving crash death Distracted distracted driving drive driver driving free hands hands-free HandsFree hands free driving hands free law hands free texting hands free while driving Headset iPhone law mobile phone Phones PSA safe Safety Samsung talking and texting while driving Teens Text Texting texting and driving texting while driving texting while driving statistics text messaging while driving while WirelessRecommended Products
-
-
-
-
-
Excellent question. Probably for the same reason we need 25,000 gun control laws on the books. So the politicians can waste even more money.
Because people who text even as pouring do not reflect that they are perilous and reckless. Therefore the government has to spell out exactly that texting should not be done even as pouring.
Well, reckless pouring is right up there with DUI. It is a very serious offense.
Texting probably falls under careless pouring. So, you are right, why have redundant laws?
Right, but could be argued I was not pouring to endanger, then it becomes a long court case.
I talk even as pouring, but I know it is perilous, especially in the city
To add another restriction.